Autopsy showed Michael Jackson death a homicide: Coroner
LOS ANGELES: The coroner who performed the autopsy on Michael Jackson testified on Tuesday that the pop star's death would have been classified a homicide even if the singer gave himself the final dose of the anaesthetic propofol.
Christopher Rogers, chief of forensic medicine for the Los Angeles County coroner, was questioned by a lawyer for Dr Conrad Murray, who is charged with causing Jackson's death by administering a lethal dose of propofol and other sedatives and failing to provide proper care.
Attorney J Michael Flanagan suggested Jackson could have swallowed the drug, which is meant to be administered intravenously.
While Rogers said that seemed unlikely, he said it would not have made a difference in his finding of homicide because of inadequate care by Murray.
Flanagan's inquiry was the first disclosure of how the defense plans to counter the involuntary manslaughter charge against Murray.
The lawyer has suggested Jackson could have injected himself intravenously while Murray was out of the room.
The testimony came during an ongoing preliminary hearing after which Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor will decide if there is enough evidence for Murray to stand trial.
Murray has pleaded not guilty, and his attorneys have said he didn't give Jackson anything that should have killed him.
In court, Flanagan displayed a chart showing the drug levels in Jackson's blood at the time of the autopsy.
Flanagan asked Rogers, "If the ingestion (of propofol) is by the decedent (and) led to these blood levels, it would not be a homicide?"
"I believe it would still be a homicide," Rogers replied.
Asked why, the witness said, "Based on the quality of the medical care, I would still call this a homicide even if the doctor didn't administer the propofol to Mr Jackson," the witness said.
Rogers said propofol should not have been present in the bedroom because it is meant only for hospital settin! gs and, "If there was propofol there, the doctor should have been prepared for the effects."
Christopher Rogers, chief of forensic medicine for the Los Angeles County coroner, was questioned by a lawyer for Dr Conrad Murray, who is charged with causing Jackson's death by administering a lethal dose of propofol and other sedatives and failing to provide proper care.
Attorney J Michael Flanagan suggested Jackson could have swallowed the drug, which is meant to be administered intravenously.
While Rogers said that seemed unlikely, he said it would not have made a difference in his finding of homicide because of inadequate care by Murray.
Flanagan's inquiry was the first disclosure of how the defense plans to counter the involuntary manslaughter charge against Murray.
The lawyer has suggested Jackson could have injected himself intravenously while Murray was out of the room.
The testimony came during an ongoing preliminary hearing after which Superior Court Judge Michael Pastor will decide if there is enough evidence for Murray to stand trial.
Murray has pleaded not guilty, and his attorneys have said he didn't give Jackson anything that should have killed him.
In court, Flanagan displayed a chart showing the drug levels in Jackson's blood at the time of the autopsy.
Flanagan asked Rogers, "If the ingestion (of propofol) is by the decedent (and) led to these blood levels, it would not be a homicide?"
"I believe it would still be a homicide," Rogers replied.
Asked why, the witness said, "Based on the quality of the medical care, I would still call this a homicide even if the doctor didn't administer the propofol to Mr Jackson," the witness said.
Rogers said propofol should not have been present in the bedroom because it is meant only for hospital settin! gs and, "If there was propofol there, the doctor should have been prepared for the effects."
Comments